Best video cards in the mid range market

What rig do you spend your time on?

Moderator: ForumModerators

nonstop
Posts: 2220
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:56 pm

Best video cards in the mid range market

Postby nonstop » Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:38 am

The chaps over at AnandTech are trying to find out what cards are the best to buy in the mid range market segment:

Image

While this has been quite a lot of information to absorb, we will do our best to sort it all out. Not only is the X1900 GT a better performer in most cases than the stock 7900 GT, but with this week's price cuts the ATI part offers an incredible value advantage. Essentially, this week we are able to get $300 performance for $230. With the recent price cuts (and if you can find one in stock), the X1900 XT has set the (just over) $300 performance mark much higher than the stock 7900 GT is able to reach. They key here is finding a card in stock, as it seems everyone wanted a piece of the action when prices dropped.

Image
Overclocking does help the 7900 GT get closer to the performance of the X1900 XT in some games. If you've got a little extra money, there isn't any reason to buy a product that pushes the envelope of its design just to be nipping at the heels of its closest price competitor in terms of performance. The X1900 XT leads the high end of the midrange market at this point in time, but if your spending limit is set hard at $300 an overclocked 7900 GT that comes in with 550+ core clock speed can be a very good option. With the price difference between the stock 7900 GT and overclocked 7900 GT being just about $15, there is no reason to settle for the significantly slower performer.

On the low end, we've got the stock 7600 GT for just over $160, which offers playable midrange performance at a low price. While the X1600 XT is about $15 cheaper, performance is abysmal. There is no reason anyone should purchase an X1600 XT at this point. With a really tight budget, the 7600 GT offers adequate gaming performance. Overclocked 7600 GT parts are just not worth the price as they don't offer any significant performance gain for the $30 premium. The X1900 GT, however, offers a whole lot more value for the additional $60 over a stock 7600 GT.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2812

FATTYLLAMA
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:14 pm

Postby FATTYLLAMA » Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:24 pm

now i havent followed these kind of statistics for a few years now, but from what ive been reading in some magazines (maximum pc and pc gamer mostly) it seems that ATI has been trailing behind everything that is nvidia... but this article disproves this completely

User avatar
Porkinator
Posts: 2087
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:47 pm
Location: none of your damn business

Postby Porkinator » Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:33 pm

The new ATI x1950 coming soon takes the speed title back from Nvida 7950 . From what I have read the quality of the ATI is better
anyways. But these are the higher end cards.

nonstop
Posts: 2220
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:56 pm

Postby nonstop » Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:47 pm

FATTYLLAMA wrote:now i havent followed these kind of statistics for a few years now, but from what ive been reading in some magazines (maximum pc and pc gamer mostly) it seems that ATI has been trailing behind everything that is nvidia... but this article disproves this completely


Well they aren't showing nvidia's fastest or ati's fastest here. It's more of a mid-upper range comparison which is where most people buy.

ATI has actually done really well lately fatty, they actually took the crown from nvidia several months ago with their x1900xtx and then nvidia introduced a dual gpu to take it back but that's not apples to apples. Like pork said ati will do the same here with a dual gpu setup and take it right back again even though they never lost it. The 7900gtx is still a great card but don't talk to rom about it... he may combust like beer does when you mention the word "tam." :wink:

User avatar
Rom
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 5:56 pm
Contact:

Postby Rom » Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:38 pm

lol now i must say i am fully happy whit it,everything runs fine and thats a kick ass card :lol: :lol: :lol:
The Deadly Frenchies

User avatar
law.of.averages
Posts: 1755
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 7:24 pm
Location: Beautiful, Sunny Florida

Postby law.of.averages » Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:35 pm

Damn, my 9800xt doesn't even make the list anymore
Image

User avatar
Avaris
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 12:31 pm
Location: Jumpin' Jesus!
Contact:

Postby Avaris » Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:00 pm

I don't know where to begin with my Ti 4200 :shock:
Image

nonstop
Posts: 2220
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 9:56 pm

Postby nonstop » Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:40 pm

More fodder on the 7900gs finally hitting retail for between 179 - 200.

Nvidia Plans to Sell GeForce 7900 GS in Retail.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/disp ... 30416.html

FATTYLLAMA
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:14 pm

Postby FATTYLLAMA » Sun Aug 13, 2006 11:32 pm

well its funny how you see things labeled as "speed king" when it has maybe 4 or 5 fps more than the card under it in some tests

if u do some testing yourself, you will find out that anything within 5-7% is within the margin of error

regardless of anything, i have a personal quarrel with ati and their quality

User avatar
Sloth
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 12:11 am
Location: Wisky
Contact:

Postby Sloth » Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:35 am

too bad i'd have to buy a pci-e capable mobo to use it :(
Image

User avatar
Avaris
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 12:31 pm
Location: Jumpin' Jesus!
Contact:

Postby Avaris » Mon Aug 14, 2006 12:34 pm

Sloth wrote:too bad i'd have to buy a pci-e capable mobo to use it :(


My mobo is AGP-only, that thing is ancient! :shock:
Image


Return to “game hardware”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests